|
Patent
5,920,938 |
By : Stanley E. Elcock, P.E. and Stanley D. Elcock
|
HISTORICALLY
|
OUR PATENTED TECHNOLOGY
|
A BRIEF HISTORY Bridge hinges are designed to mitigate temperature and construction forces
Before the Seismic Retrofit Program in California, bridge hinges were not connected |
During the
Seismic Retrofit Program bridges hinges were connected by steel
cables, tie rods,
Bearing pads are designed to cushion the impact from traffic loading. Bearing pads were installed prior to the concrete pour for the bridge itself, which left no practical means for bearing pad replacement after compression failure.
Bearing pads are installed the same way today
|
Earlier Repair Attempts:
Hinge failure at X Street in Sacramento
|
Our Patent Demonstration on the Smith Point Bridge in Humboldt County:
After review of the as-built plans the “stabilized” compression was in fact complete bearing pad failure. The hinges were bearing concrete-on-concrete and that it appeared that the south hinge shear keys were crushed. The Standard Drawing in the as-builts only required 1" of expanded polystyrene on top of the concrete shear keys. This accounted for the "stabilized compression" noted in previous Caltrans Bridge Inspection Reports. Crushed concrete shear keys would account for the compression over 1".
|
Patented Success:
The patent
demonstration resulted in replacement of the exterior bearing pads
and installation of belting material from inside the cored holes at
a fraction of the cost of conventional methods and without the need
for expensive temporary supports, right-of-way, or environmental
permits. However, during the demonstration existing hinge damage
was identified that had gone unnoticed until this time. An
additional benefit to utilizing this patented technology is the easy
assessment of the actual condition of concrete hinges.
Seismic
Retrofit Hindsight:
By
1997 the Seismic Retrofit strategy for concrete hinges had changed
by enlarging the 9" cored hole to 10". This allows for about 5/8"
clearance around the pipe restrainer. Caltrans Structures Design
originally detailed minimal clearance ( 1/8" ) around the pipe
restrainer on Seismic Retrofit contracts prior to 1997. The
Smith Point Bridge Project revealed daily hinge deterioration due to
the cyclic deflection of the bridge simply from normal traffic
loading. Consequently, when the hinge seismic pipe
restrainer clearance in the planned cored holes is less than the
deflection of the span due to truck traffic, the retrofitted hinge
will eventually destroy all hinge Seismic Retrofit work due to the
pipe restrainer pounding against the hinge interior every time a
truck crosses the bridge. Instead of solid concrete shear keys and
solid concrete surrounding the hinge pipe restrainers, Caltrans and
its partners have introduced a design flaw that results in the
destruction of the concrete bridge hinge, which compromises the
bridge structural integrity and more importantly public safety.
Interior bridge hinge photos
during the Patent Demonstration on the Smith Point
Bridge. |
Klamath River Bridge on Highway 101 in Del Norte County January 2006:
One of the
Klamath River Bridge hinges on Highway 101 in Del Norte County
|
Klamath River
Bridge Emergency Repair 2006. Total cost $ 4,000,000.00
|
Bay Bridge Skyway Section
|
|
The seismic pipe restrainer on steroids (Sheet 787 of the Bay Bridge Plans)
This
hinge is supported by the 6 foot diameter pipe restrainers shown
above. For more information e-mail: stanelcock@yahoo.com
|
Stanley E. Elcock is a Professional Civil Engineer, owner of SEE Civil Engineering, and co-owner of patent 5,920,938 with over 20 years experience in highways and bridges. Recent publications include collaboration on the Rock Creek Bridge Project. Stanley D. Elcock is a retired materials testing engineer, NICET certified Senior Engineering Technician with NICET Level IV certifications in soils, concrete and asphalt. His engineering roots can be traced back to Boulder City, where his father Stanley T. Elcock worked as a Civil Engineer for the Bureau of Reclamation on the Hoover Dam and later on Shasta Dam. He is also co-owner of patent 5,920,938. |